Oct 21 • General discussion
Core idea: Embrace paradox to perform at a higher level; Extreme Balance
One of the book’s foundational notions is that high performance — in sports, business or life — often depends not on picking one side and sticking to it, but rather on holding two (or more) seemingly opposite concepts and letting both live in your mindset. As Askren puts it:
“The same person who advocates for one approach may, in another situation, sincerely extol the virtues of its opposite… The well-informed expert realises that the paradoxical approach often is the very thing that works.”
And:
“How do we balance the many mindsets that appear to be in direct opposition to one another?”
In short: rather than thinking “this is right / that is wrong”, the book argues for “both/and”. For example: you can be fierce and controlled, be confident and humble, push hard and rest well, strategic and impulsive, etc.
This “holding opposites” mindset is central.
Why this matters (and how it shows up)
- In the introduction, the authors say they’ll explore “the role of art and science … the importance of holding the tension of opposites, and the risk of being inflexible.”
- Askren — as a wrestler/MMA athlete — talks about how winning wasn’t just about physical dominance, but about mindset: his training, innovation, mental approach.
- On a practical level: You may need rigor and discipline, and flexibility and adaptability. You may need to be calm under pressure, and still have intensity when required. You may need to trust your preparation, and also respond in the moment / improvise. You may need to compete hard, and also recover well.
Key principles with paradox examples
Here are several of the book’s “paradoxical principles” (not exhaustive), showing the “opposite truths” idea:
- Effort vs Ease – you push ultra-hard in training, but you also learn when to ease up, when less is more.
- Confidence vs Uncertainty – you believe you’re capable (confidence), yet you accept there are unknowns and you must stay curious or humble (uncertainty).
- Structure vs Improvisation – you follow systems and routines, yet you also adapt spontaneously when the situation demands.
- Aggression vs Control – you fight/compete fiercely, but you must maintain composure and control so you don’t become reckless.
- Persistence vs Recovery – you keep grinding and showing up, yet you also know when to rest and recharge to avoid burnout.
How to apply the “holding opposites” mindset
- Awareness: Recognise the tension between two opposing forces. E.g., “I need to train hard, but if I train too hard I’ll overuse and lose performance.”
- Flexibility: Be willing to lean into one side when context demands it, then shift to the other side when the situation changes. The book emphasises that context matters.
- Integration: Don’t treat the opposites as enemies; treat them as partners. For example: “I will push hard and I will recover smart.”
- Dynamic balance: The goal isn’t static equilibrium (50/50) but shifting balance over time. One day you might need more push, another day more rest.
- Mindset over method: The “both/and” approach is more about how you think than specific drills. It’s about your mental operating system.
Why competing ideas make sense in competition
In a competitive environment:
- Conditions change quickly — what worked yesterday may fail today. If you’re rigid, you lose. Holding opposing capabilities gives you options.
- Opponents exploit one-dimensional folks. If you’re either all aggression or all caution, they’ll adapt. If you can move between modes, you’re unpredictable.
- Mental game is huge — belief, resilience, adaptability. Having dual capacities means you can transition when needed.
- As Askren’s background shows: he innovated in wrestling despite not being “naturally athletic” compared to some peers. His mindset allowed him to use what he had, adapt the unknown, hold contradictions (e.g., being undersized but still dominant) to his advantage.
Potential pitfalls & cautions
- It’s easy to become unclear or incoherent if you hold opposites but never decide which to apply when. The book emphasises contextual decision-making.
- You might flip-flop too often (one day push, next day slack) without consistency. The “balance” still requires discipline.
- Holding opposites doesn’t mean being scattered: you still need a guiding objective (what you’re aiming for) so the contradictions serve the goal, not distract from it.
- You must practice the paradoxical mindset. Just reading about it doesn’t embed it. The book draws on sports psychology & practice examples.
Summary – in a nutshell
- The book argues that greatness often lies in embracing paradox — not choosing one side, but being able to hold both sides of a tension.
- You want to develop the capacity to move between opposites (push/pull, structured/free, confident/open) depending on what reality demands.
- The context is competitive performance, but these ideas apply broadly (career, personal life, teams).
- Holding opposites gives you adaptability, depth, and resilience — rather than being stuck in “only one way”.
- Success isn’t one-dimensional; it’s multidimensional. The more opposites you integrate constructively, the more robust your mindset.
4
0 comments
Core idea: Embrace paradox to perform at a higher level; Extreme Balance
powered by
skool.com/chris-miah-coaching-6869
An exclusive group to support elite performers in combat sports.
Suggested communities
Powered by