🧠 Emotion Regulation in Canine Welfare: Beyond Behavior

In human–animal interactions, we’re still learning how to recognize what true well-being looks like from the animal’s perspective. For the most part, we can only observe behavior — yet behavior is often a mask.

Just as humans adapt through social masking or emotional suppression, dogs can also learn to inhibit signals of distress or arousal as a survival strategy. When their environment consistently discourages authentic expression, “calm” behavior may reflect shut-down states rather than regulation or trust.

If we measure welfare only through compliance or quietness, we risk rewarding performative survival instead of genuine emotional safety. 🐾

To make lasting change — particularly for dogs with trauma or chronic stress — we need to look beyond surface-level obedience toward nervous system literacy: understanding thresholds, arousal curves, and the timing and intensity required for memory reconsolidation and true emotional learning.

There’s enormous potential in exploring how evidence-based modalities from human therapy — like somatic experiencing, EMDR principles, or co-regulation frameworks — might inform modern canine behavior work. These approaches don’t replace training; they refine it, grounding it in affective neuroscience and emotional timing rather than operant precision alone.

(And credit where it’s due — Dr. Karen Overall began championing this integration more than a decade ago. The field is only now catching up.)

💬 Discussion prompt:

How do you recognize the difference between emotional suppression and true regulation in your dog or your clients’ dogs?

What signals tell you safety is genuine — not just practiced?

0 comments

Before the Bark

skool.com/beforethebark

Exploring connection, regulation, and trust between humans and dogs — where understanding comes before obedience. 🌿🐾

Member

Online

Admin