Human-Centered AI: Executive Playbook
Human-Centered AI – Executive Playbook
Thesis: AI's economic potential is large; realized value depends on implementation philosophy. Systems that augment people deliver measurable productivity improvements; designs that reduce people to fallback validators create predictable control and safety gaps. The operating model is human-centered: AI as instrument; people as accountable decision-makers.
Reference Pattern
Macro potential. Credible modeling puts AI's potential at ~$13T of additional global output by 2030 (McKinsey Global Institute, 2018).
Execution risk. Industry analysts forecast that >40% of "agentic AI" projects will be canceled by 2027 due to unclear value, governance, and integration complexity (Gartner prediction via Forbes — forecast, not fact).
Field evidence. Large-scale call-center deployments report ~14–15% productivity gains, with larger lifts for less-experienced workers — a strong augmentation signal (MIT/Stanford, 2023–2024).
Safety governance. U.S. regulators analyzed 13 fatal crashes involving Autopilot misuse and criticized insufficient driver-engagement controls, prompting a major recall and ongoing oversight (NHTSA primary documentation).
Implementation signals. • IBM later sold key Watson Health assets after years of underperformance (source) • Amazon retired its recruiting model after bias was revealed (Reuters) • Google Duplex added disclosure commitments after public backlash about impersonation (The Verge)
AI-Support for Humans — Design Principle 1
AI as Personal Assistant, Not Supervisor
  • AI proposes; humans decide and remain accountable. Decision rights, sign-offs, liability remain with human roles.
  • AI handles repetition; humans handle interpretation and trade-offs. Automate standardized tasks; reserve judgment for ambiguity.
  • AI retains context; humans set objectives and boundaries. Use AI to surface history, constraints, precedents; humans define goals and limits.
  • AI operates continuously; humans operate sustainably. Offload after-hours monitoring and preparation; protect human workload.
  • AI outputs are advisory by default. Require explicit human acceptance for actions with material risk.
  • AI interactions are inspectable. Log prompts, inputs, lineage, model versions, rationales for audit and learning.
  • AI escalation paths are predefined. Route uncertainty, low confidence, or policy conflicts to named owners.
  • AI confidence signals are visible. Show confidence, input coverage, and known limitations with each recommendation.
  • AI fits systems of record. Capture outcomes, overrides, and learnings where teams already work.
  • AI performance tracks human-relevant KPIs: cycle time; first-pass yield; error severity; rework; override rate.
Example (Marketing). AI generates campaign variants, compiles cross-channel performance, and drafts briefs. Brand owners review, select/adapt, record rationale in the system of record, and schedule A/B tests with predefined guardrails and rollback criteria.
Evidence cue. Aligns with augmentation findings (~14–15% lift, larger for novices) (source).
AI-Support for Humans — Design Principle 2
Augment Creativity, Not Automate It
  • AI as brainstorming partner to expand option sets.
  • AI as skill amplifier to lower barriers in design, analysis, and coding (experts still review).
  • AI as feedback accelerator for fast, low-risk iteration.
  • AI as pattern finder; humans determine relevance and story.
Example (Design). Teams use generative tools to explore orders-of-magnitude more concepts; human selection, editing, and narrative alignment remain central.
AI-Support for Humans — Design Principle 3
Build Bridges, Not Silos
  • Cross-functional intelligence: shared ontologies across Sales, Product, Support, Finance.
  • Context persistence: capture and reuse institutional knowledge.
  • Dependency alerts: automatic surfacing of cross-team impacts.
  • Meeting enablement (consent-based): summarization, action extraction, and follow-up.
Example (Collaboration). An AI workspace tracks decisions and dependencies; when a change affects another team's constraints, stakeholders are notified with rationale and options.
AI-Support for Humans — Design Principle 4
Prevent Burnout Through Intelligence
  • Eliminate low-value administrative work.
  • Link tasks to outcomes to make contributions visible.
  • Reduce cognitive load with automatic context assembly.
  • Protect focus time via interruption management and batching.
Example (Operations). An "AI chief of staff" drafts briefs, compiles status, schedules deep-work blocks, and maps work items to OKRs.
Evidence cue. Technostress and burnout risks rise with poor rollout; aligning AI with workload reduction and employee control mitigates risk (MIT research).
AI-Support for Humans — Design Principle 5
Market Understanding = Human Insight × AI Scale
  • Quantitative × qualitative: large-scale analysis with human sense-making.
  • Predictive × intuitive: forecasts tempered by domain judgment.
  • Global × local: macro patterns with cultural and regulatory context.
  • Historical × emergent: learned trends with horizon scanning.
Example (Product/Strategy). AI monitors customer behavior, competitor moves, and market dynamics; product leads decide which signals merit experiments.
Are you planning to implement AI into your Human Resources and other organizational parts? Go to https://www.skool.com/artificialintelligence/about and book a call to see if your situation could be a fit to work together in the private AI Group.
1
0 comments
Johannes Faupel
4
Human-Centered AI: Executive Playbook
powered by
Artificial Intelligence AI
skool.com/artificial-intelligence-8395
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Natural Language Processing NLP, Computer Vision, ANI, AGI, ASI, Human in the loop, SEO
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by