I understand the attraction of using Skills...
They're the ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ right now.๐
(And for people like me with ADHD, that gets our attention.)
HERE'S THE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER BEFORE YOU REPLACE AI ASSISTANTS WITH SKILLS....
Pre-built AI-assistants (like CustomGPTs and AI-chatbots) have been around for a few years and aren't new and shiny object anymore....
BUT these types of AI tools have a very powerful place in your offer ecosystem... They serve your clients and students on the frontend of your offer.
๐ต๐๐ ๐๐๐๐. ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ท๐ฌ๐น ๐ฌ๐บ๐บ๐ฌ๐ต๐ป๐ฐ๐จ๐ณ.
So trading them in for Claude Skills...
That's where people are making a mistake.
Here's THREE REASONS why Skills are not a substitute for pre-built, pretrained AI Co-Coaches and assistants like GPTs...
โ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป #๐ญ: ๐ฌ๐ผ๐'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐๐ฃ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐๐ฒ๐
๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ.
When you create a pre-built AI-assistant trained on your frameworks, your IP is embedded IN it. It's working FOR your clients ~ guiding them through your specific process, in your voice, toward a specific process and outcome.
Your clients don't see the behind-the-scenes instructions.
They don't see your knowledge docs and files.
They just get the user experience.
When you hand someone a Claude Skill, you're handing them your entire methodology. Your proprietary frameworks. Your specific way of getting clients results is right there. In a document, they can read, copy, and share. There's not security at all.
That's not a delivery upgrade. That's an IP issue. And your have zero control.
โ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป #๐ฎ: ๐ฌ๐ผ๐'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ผ "๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐๐."
With pre-built AI-assistants, your client opens it and starts getting support instantly.
No setup. No installation. No customizing. No figuring out anything.
With a Claude Skill, you're going to have to "teach" your clients how to use it: unzip, update and customize, zip it back up, where to install it (if they are even using claude), and test it out ~ all before they've gotten one result from your "easy to use" AI tool.
You built your program to make your clients' lives easier. Adding an AI tech hurdle at the front door is the opposite of that.
โ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป #๐ฏ: ๐๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป'๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ.
A Claude skill only works if your client is already using Claude. Otherwise they're out of luck.
So instead of adding a powerful, time-saving benefit of AI Co-Coaches to your offer ~ you've handed them a tool they can't use, on a platform they don't have, that requires a subscription they may not want to pay for.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ง ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐. ๐๐ก๐๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ "๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ " ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ข๐ซ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ.
โ
But a pre-built AI Co-Coach or assistant built on a platform like ChatGPT, Pickaxe, or even vibe-coded is ready and waiting 24/7.
No new account. No new subscription. No new learning curve.
They click the link and get to work!
That's the difference between adding AI to your offer that your clients will actually use ~ and adding something that sounds sexy - until they try to access it and have to deal with the learning curve.
I know Skills are a powerful tool. I use them, and teach them to my tech-savvy students who are ready to go deeper into AI for the backend operations of their business.
But they are not a replacement for a forward-facing, pre-built AI-assistants made specifically to get your clients through the slower parts of your offer and to their desired results faster.
And if you're a small business owner who wants to upgrade your programs and business with AI integration systems~ learn about my AI coaching and implementation program, Build-With-Wendy. Inside BWW, you have high-touch, done-with-you guidance and coaching to create the right systems for the frontend and backend of your business.