7h • General discussion
Why I stopped trying to go viral and started building a conversion machine instead
Viral content got me 50K views once. Revenue from it: $0.
My "boring" daily content averages 200-400 views per post. Monthly revenue: $4,800.
The math is brutal and obvious once you see it.
Viral content attracts everyone. Conversion content attracts buyers.
Here's what changed when I stopped chasing viral:
Old content strategy: hooks designed for maximum reach, broad topics, entertainment-focused.
New content strategy: hooks designed for qualified attention, specific problem-focused, transformation-oriented.
The difference in who shows up in my audience:
Viral audience: curious scrollers, entertainment seekers, people with no real intent to buy.
Conversion audience: people actively searching for a solution, already half-convinced they need what I'm offering.
A post that reaches 300 of the RIGHT people outperforms a post that reaches 30,000 of the wrong ones.
AI helps me write for intent, not reach. I give Claude a specific customer problem and ask it to write for the person who already knows they have that problem and is looking for a solution.
That framing change took my conversion rate from 0.4% to 3.1%.
Less reach. More revenue. Better business.
0
0 comments
Why I stopped trying to go viral and started building a conversion machine instead
skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553
Discover how to make more money with AI and save 1,000s of hours with AI Automation! NEW AI trainings released daily, for FREE!
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
🔥
+905
2
🔥
+572
3
+357
4
+143
5
+141
Powered by