It Still Only IS Like "Google Images" -- So What's in It for **Me** ??

Yes, people tout how important "AI Ranking" is, how we suddenly call it "GEO" (what used to be SEO), and how badly "we want" to be CITED by this AI tool or the next...

Okay, I get it -- but it's still an ENORMOUSLY BAD DEAL for us!

Why?

How much traffic do you get from Google Images? Can you be sure you EVER MADE A SALE off a Google-Images visitor coming in to your website or -- better yet -- sales funnel or email list? I doubt it.

So even IF you manage to GEO-engineer :) your way up the "AI Ladder" -- what really do you gain?

Somebody please do explain. Somebody please SHOW ME THE MONEY b/c so far non being there...

___

And, hey: that pun is -- of course -- inteneded; also the term GEO is spectacularly bad as it is not "searchable" anymore. (Anything GEO lands you nearly everywhere, except ranking web assets!) Oh my.

0 comments