User
Write something
🎙️Insiders AMA Live w/LGJ🎙️ is happening in 25 hours
Pinned
Welcome! READ THIS First 👀
I am so excited to share my passions for AI automation with you. I created this community for actual business owners that want to start implementing AI into their businesses to scale faster, with less staff. This community will NOT be free for long. I will be adding my automations piece-by-piece. These are the SAME automations I use in my Inc 5000 agency that enable us to scale to $700K/mo with few staff. Now some next steps... 1. INTRODUCE YOURSELF in the comments on this post. 2. ASK FOR HELP if you need it by posting in the 'Automation Help' category. Include loom videos. My team and the community will try to help. BEFORE asking for help, search for your issue in the search bar. 3. GIVE VALUE. Help others if they ask. Share your own automation templates and walkthroughs. 4. BLUEPRINTS are available inside the Classroom and separated by use case (Sales, content, etc). You may need to pay to unlock certain modules. 5. WAITING is available for our AI Automation Insider Ultra program. Details coming soon. Welcome to the AI Automation Insiders!
Welcome! READ THIS First 👀
Pinned
New Video: 3 jobs I took away from Claude Code and gave to Codex
Hello nerds. Astra is not AGI. But I did cancel one of my three Claude Code subscriptions, and the Codex app is now open on my screen all day. Three jobs moved over. 1. Anything in a browser. Astra knows where to click. It records my demo videos, fixes the user experience on pages Claude Code built, and maps the internal API of apps that don't have one. Skool included. 2. Writing code. Fable plans and reviews, Codex's cheaper models write the code in parallel, and Astra signs off on the risky calls. Way fewer Fable tokens burned. 3. Images. Through an API every thumbnail cost me about $5. Inside the Codex app it's included in your plan. It generates, reviews its own work and redoes the bad ones for $0. It's a glitch, and I doubt it stays open. Don't cancel Claude Code. The heavy lifting still happens there. Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKDm0lUB_Mo&list=PL0Yyhj9Mcbg8-kTfPi3s9hnIIDk5nl8m1 FREE RESOURCES FROM THE VIDEO -Codex Bridge (yours to install, you need a paid ChatGPT plan with Codex to run it): https://leadgenjay.com/skills/codex-bridge -CLI-Anything, the GitHub repo to hand to Codex: https://github.com/HKUDS/CLI-Anything Go watch it, then tell me which job you're moving first.
Want Brutal Product Feedback? Charge
Nobody gives you real feedback on something they got for free. Somebody on the AMA offered to be a guinea pig for something I'm building, and it got me thinking about the order I actually use. The best guinea pigs are, first, my team. Second, my Insiders. Third, people who are actually paying me. And you don't really get the real feedback until people are paying you money. That's what I learned launching Consulti, our cold email lead gen software. We had our team demo it. Then we had our Insiders demo it. I got pretty solid feedback out of both of those rounds. Then people started paying me for it, and man, it was a whole different level of feedback. My guess at why: a free tester will tell you what's broken, and a paying customer will tell you what's broken in the exact workflow they needed to finish today. Free testers aren't lazy, they're just not under the same pressure. Someone testing as a favor pokes at it with whatever part of their day is already flexible. Someone who paid runs it straight into their actual constraints on day one, and their tolerance for a rough edge is zero. I'm not telling you to skip the friendly rounds. I still run them. My staff is demoing and debugging the next thing I'm building right now, and that round will catch plenty. Just don't read a clean internal test as evidence that you're ready. Read it as evidence that you removed the obvious problems. The painful ones are still out there, waiting for somebody with a credit card. Which group are you testing with right now?
Instagram Automation
Not sure what the capabilities of AI and automations are, but is it possible to automate the entire Instagram DM process? 1. First messages: Automatically send a first message when someone follows the account or engages with the content, such as viewing a story, liking a post, or commenting. 2. Follow-ups: Automatically follow up with prospects and share relevant case studies, articles, or other resources based on their exact situation, so the conversation naturally picks up where it left off rather than feeling generic or repetitive. 3. Conversation handling: Have AI handle the entire conversation from the first message through qualification, objection handling, and follow-ups, all the way until the prospect books a call. 4. Account safety: Can all of this be done in a way that stays within Instagram’s rules and minimizes the risk of the account being restricted or banned? I’m not sure what’s currently possible with AI and Instagram automations, so I’d love to understand what can realistically be automated, what still needs a human involved, and what tools would be required to set this up.
The template hoard vs actual deployment
It is dangerously easy to import dozens of pre-built n8n workflows and agent skills without ever shipping a single paid client system. You feel productive loading up GitHub repos and testing triggers, but turning those raw automations into a repeatable, deliverable service is where everything tends to stall out. Having the backend blueprints solves the technical hurdle, but packaging and deploying them consistently is another battle entirely. For anyone building out their agency offer here, where does the transition from testing templates to delivering for real clients usually break down?
1-30 of 610
AI AUTOMATION INSIDERS
skool.com/ai-automation-insiders
Learn Claude Code, AI Agents, and N8N. Install the EXACT AI systems I use inside my $1mil/mo companies. Sell my systems as an AI Agency offer.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by