Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Tyler

Honest Profits

Private • 81 • Free

MISSION: Generate boatloads of profits without feeling like you've sold your soul. Ethical Sales Funnel Strategies for Coaches & Consultants.

Memberships

Skool Community

Public • 162.7k • Paid

The Skool Games

Private • 21.7k • Free

The Ad Men Mastermind

Private • 86 • Free

The 7-Figure Entrepreneur

Private • 3k • Free

Conversion Experts (CRO)

Private • 598 • Free

Pwrd Accelerator

Private • 75 • Free

PwrdUniversity

Public • 43 • $79/m

Kingdom Discipleship Academy

Private • 27 • Free

Kingdom Creator Academy

Private • 52 • $47/m

1 contribution to Lords of Marketing
Split Testing Images on Sales pages
Hey guys! We just got a 34% lift by split testing the image on a sales page for a health brand and wanted to report back on it. The importance of the above the fold image on your landing pages can’t be overstated. They’re also some of the easiest tests to run.. even if you put zero thought into it. To be honest, randomly testing images on your LPs is probably a good use of your time. As in, putting 30 seconds of thought into it and testing will probably get you results. But if you want to put a 10 minutes of thought into it, you can use the following framework for a test: “Aspirational” vs. “identifiable” Aspirational images appeal to the end result/the person they will become by using the product. They showcase what and who your customer WANTS to be. If you sell skincare, this would be showing a young and attractive woman or man with perfect skin. Identifiable images appeal to who the customer currently is. Prevailing wisdom would say that aspirational one would win out. I mean, isn’t the whole point of product marketing to show what the person can become if they buy a product? The truth is that depends on the confidence of the avatar. Some markets and avatars are so mistrusting and jaded from trying dozens of solutions that they don’t even believe that they can get to the end goal. If you show them an aspirational image, it’s just going to turn them off. If you’re dealing with an insecure market, identifiable image would likely be more appropriate. So which test won in the test I referenced above? Aspirational. My theory is because the brand has a pretty clear unique mechanism that has a ton of trust built-in to the product. Even jaded and sophisticated prospects believe the results. Sidenote: You can use both as aspirational and identifiable images in the same above the fold. Before and after images oftentimes show both - the before is identifiable, the after is aspirational. Showing the transformation builds trust. The beauty of split testing is it puts all the armchair philosophizing to bed… even though I love armchair philosophizing about CRO. Ultimately, the market decides. What we think doesn’t matter.
6
4
New comment Sep 2
1 like • Aug 28
This is a super cool point. Car advertising is a great example to touch on. I find their ads are a great mix of both (balance)... They showcase identifiable experiences while highlighting aspirational outcomes of those experiences. Nike also did this with their one ad of the overweight kid running. Identifiable self perception with the aspirational activity of him running down the side of a highway all by himself. This mix inspires the type of thinking that things CAN be different. Great food for thought. Thank you both for sharing. @Ethan Bence @Tobias Allen
1-1 of 1
Tyler Bertie
1
4points to level up
@tyler-bertie-9260
Funnel Builder for… ♟️ Patrick Bet-David 💰 Jeremy Miner ⚔️ Bedros Keuilian 🚀 And other 7, 8, and 9 figure brands

Active 6d ago
Joined Jul 19, 2024
powered by