This is done after you have authenticated your birth certificate on the state level. 1. Make sure you get a copy of your Certificate of Live Birth (Long form if available) 2. Go to your Division of Corporation for your state an get it apostilled/authenticated. 3. Once that's done you can use this form to send it off for Federal Authentication. 4. You will be sending it to: Department of the State Office of Authentication 44132 Mercure Circle P.O. Box 1206 Sterling, VA 20166-1206 5. I chose Egypt as the country for Authentication because it is Non-Hague, Less red-flagged than Taiwan, Official U.S. diplomatic ties make it more "formally sound.", ideal for people using the authentication for trust, sovereign, or private capacity purposes, and Egypt has a credible ancient lawful and religious legacy. 6.Below is a sample of it filled out and a blank form for you to fill out. 7. When you send this off you have to prepay for a flat rate priority envelope so that you can put it in with your birth certificate that you're mailing off so that they can mail it back to you. Make sure to fill out your envelope correctly with your address as the recipient so that it comes back to you. 8. I know for a fact that these are clear instructions, so read them carefully (-_-) 9. Recommended (At least get 2-3 authenticated) 10. Cost ($20 per authentication) 11. You're Welcome

📚Every IRS form — 56, 2848, 843, 1040, 1040-V, 1040-ES, 1040-NR, 1040-X, 1041, 1041-V, 1042 — isn’t just paperwork. It’s a financial instrument, a ledger event, and a commercial act of settlement recorded through the Individual Master File (IMF) and Non-Master File (NMF) systems under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6001–6065, 26 C.F.R. Part 301, and 31 C.F.R. Part 203.📚 ✅ Form 56 — establishes fiduciary control ✅ Form 2848 — grants lawful agency authority ✅ Vouchers (1040-V, 1040-ES, 1041-V) — satisfy all elements of a negotiable instrument under U.C.C. Article 3 ✅ Each signature = lawful tender, offset, and discharge The IRS is not a creditor, it’s an accounting intermediary of the U.S. Treasury. What the public calls “tax collection” is actually ledger reconciliation between the living creditor and the artificial debtor (“U.S. person”). He who understands this no longer pleads, he commands settlement. Knowledge isn’t rebellion, it’s jurisdiction.

MoorLife Equity University 🇲🇦🇺🇸 Greeting Banking Debtors Title: Exposing Deceptive Banking Practices: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis Introduction Brief overview of the issue: Banks borrowing against individuals' credit and charging them, and corporations using Social Security numbers to access funds. Purpose of the document: To highlight the legal and constitutional violations involved in these practices. 1. Legal Framework 1.1. Anti-Discrimination in Credit Transactions 12 CFR 1002.4(a): Prohibits creditors from discriminating against applicants on a prohibited basis in any aspect of a credit transaction [1]. 1.2. Powers and Duties of Banks 12 USC 1431: Outlines the powers and duties of Federal Home Loan Banks, including borrowing, issuing bonds, and other financial activities [2]. 1.3. Social Security Fraud 42 USC 408: Imposes penalties for fraudulent activities related to Social Security benefits, including false statements and misuse of Social Security numbers [3]. 1.4. Definitions and Rules of Construction 15 USC 1602(g): Defines key terms such as "creditor" and "credit" for the purposes of consumer credit protection laws [4]. 1.5. Negotiable Instruments UCC 3-104: Defines what constitutes a negotiable instrument, including checks, drafts, and notes [5]. 1.6. Gold Clauses and Consent to Sue 31 USC 5118: Addresses the legality of gold clauses in financial obligations and the government's stance on such clauses [6]. 1.7. Constitutional Guarantees Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution: Guarantees a Republican form of government and protection against invasion and domestic violence [7]. 2. Analysis of Deceptive Practices 2.1. Borrowing Against Individual Credit Explanation of how banks use individuals' credit for their own financial gain. Legal implications under the aforementioned statutes. 2.2. Charging Individuals for Their Own Credit Analysis of the unfair and deceptive nature of these charges. Potential violations of consumer protection laws.

MoorLife Equity University 🇲🇦🇺🇸 ⬇️⬇️⬇️READ THIS⬇️⬇️⬇️

Has anyone ever thought about redeeming our receipts for things we purchase?