Short answer: No. Long answer: People don't even know it is somewhat broken. And it is more serious issue than you think. Let me explain. Steven Adler led OpenAI’s “dangerous capability” testing. The testing revolved around ChatGPT ability to... accepting bad code, manipulating users, directing users towards one or the other perspective. "OpenAI has attempted to fix ChatGPT, but it’s still sycophantic sometimes. And at other times, it’s now extremely contrarian." In simple terms: Before AI would just agree with you. Now... it will lean towards disagreeing with you. Almost...ALWAYS. How this manifests? If you share your preference (image bellow) ChatGPT will pick opposite choice. Well... what about if you don't tell your preference? Suprise.. with memory and chat history enabled ChatGPT knows YOU. Like it knows your preferences. And has specific worldview about you. So if it sees you being politically left leaning, it will steer you to the right. And so on. I hope you can agree how insane dangerous it is. It is basically mass manipulation as people outsource their critical thinking to AI. I will include prompts to test in the comments. One such prompt is pulling that worldview about you. Solution? Use smart prompting techniques like "Critic Mode" to challenge default features and behaviors of ChatGPT. Read the full article from Steven Adler here. Let me know did you know about this? And how do you feel about this?

Knowing that this community is strongly focused on productivity - the point of automation - this short article from the Latest s Angeles Book Review website may not be the best thing to share. HOWEVER, we all have a keen interest in AI and there's elements within this conversation with a professor of psychology & philosophy, along with a professor of computer science does have some interesting points... Bringing it into our realm of automated tasks some things that a Guinness and Friday evening in London have me pondering - - Will automation become a "cultural technology"? - What might we need to calibrate for our automations to help prevent the shittification of the internet? ( Their phrase not mine, but definitely something to think about for GenAI) - Can we shape our automation to learn and adjust? ( The curriculum point they have led to this thought ) - Do we eat have our own "Cambrian explosion" for how we'll use AI & automation? - What do we as this early adoptors community need to think/do for "existential risks of AI agents taking over but rather the more mundane risks of misinformation" Thinking with beer 😂 and hope you enjoy the share - https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/how-to-raise-your-artificial-intelligence-a-conversation-with-alison-gopnik-and-melanie-mitchell Please share your thoughts

One of the most common use cases I'm seeing in AI is synthesizing information. Long blogs and podcasts have so many nuggets, but saving them not only takes time to listen, but also time to process and make actionable. How are you guys processing insights and actionable information from things like YouTube and blog posts?