Journaling with Lesson 27
Today’s practice represents, with direct clarity and instruction, exactly the outcome we are choosing to achieve: your commitment to choosing Truth. Above ALL else, I want to See. How can any other goal be equally as valuable? Consider the following instruction in case you have challenges with today’s practice. If, there were moments throughout the day when you were unable to stay on task, take a breath, focus within, and review the other replacement goals or activities which were on your thinking mind today. Yes, distraction is easy and True Sight is not defined by your mind, in a concrete manner, in your current experience. Therefore, making disciplined time to realize Seeing ABOVE all else really does not make much sense to you at this moment of time. Above all else… what is this Sight and what is all else? The thinking mind analyzing asks, “How can I ask to See, when I am not blind?” The thinking mind does not recognize its own blindness. Every circumstance, attribute, body that the thinking mind ‘sees’ is given definition. These objects and subjects are clearly and easily, if not instantly, judged. The objects and subjects then contain ‘understanding’, long before they can be doubted. This is why forgiveness and choosing again is far from easy. By first allowing for forgiveness and then bringing the practice to consciousness practice, Your unlearning mind is literally turning itself on its heels to ‘imaginatively’ go in the opposite direction of every thought ever recognized. Your thoughts seem instantaneous. These thoughts ‘just appear’ without hesitation or a personal self choosing them. Walk down any street and briefly look around. Immediately your brain will be flooded by narrations of the objects seen and experiences perceived. “I know what this is for… and this… and this…” No doubt here, right? For me to say that you are doing this to yourself makes zero sense. But yet, here I am not only Guiding you to this self-admission; but also, letting you know that you are blind. Sounds insulting! Rationally, what lunatic would dare listen to My words. We are not even bringing up the fact that the words being written down in this moment’s conversation are coming from the same seeming ‘inside my head’ experience. How can you be asked to choose between when the evidence is so confusing?