I’m teaming up with Equa Academy for an unmissable FREE online event, where we’ll be diving deep into the UK’s fastest-growing property strategy: Commercial Conversions! 🏗️💰 Join us Tonight, 6PM, and discover how to: ✅ Fund, convert, and flip properties without picking up a single tool ✅ Create 6-figure profits from just one deal ✅ Avoid the costly red tape most investors miss This is your chance to secure your financial future and learn the exact system transforming lives across the UK property scene. 👉 Register now.. The Commercial Conversions Webinar

Just came across this BBC piece that really caught my attention… A major developer, Persimmon Homes, is asking to cut back the number of affordable homes on a large housing estate near Norwich. Originally, the plan was to build 1,000 homes with a third being affordable. But now, due to “rising costs” and “site issues,” they’re only building around 780, and want to slash the affordable units from 185 down to just 30. The local parish council is pushing back, saying this makes it even harder for residents to get on the property ladder and that there’s been “no engagement” from the developer. This really highlights the tension between profitability vs. community impact, doesn’t it? On one hand, developers are struggling with rising costs… but on the other, families are finding it harder than ever to buy their first home. What do you think should councils hold developers accountable for delivering affordable homes, even if the numbers “don’t stack up”? Or should developers be given flexibility to make their projects viable? Drop your thoughts below 👇 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33rx8npzj8o

Bid in on Friday for a Church to residential conversion (15 studio apartments) with a 50/50 chance. Start looking for the next one. There is some good stuff available up here.