Your old logo got you attention.
The way you communicate determines whether you deserve it. Your past pedigree established credibility, but your current articulation determines whether you sustain it. Most consultants who exit firms like Deloitte, McKinsey, or PwC unconsciously continue to speak in the institutional dialect that once validated them. Their content mirrors corporate memoranda grammatically precise, strategically empty, and it projects hierarchy instead of expertise. Inside the firm, authority is inherited. Outside it, authority is constructed. When every post begins with “After six years at Deloitte,” you’re not signaling relevance; You’re reciting history. It reads like an alumni announcement rather than an analysis of value. Credibility no longer resides in association. It resides in interpretation how you translate your experience into frameworks that alter performance for real businesses. If you still sound like an ex-pedigree operator: 1. You anchor status to institutions rather than to intellectual property. 2. You describe deliverables, not transformations. 3. You generalize outcomes to sound broad instead of measuring them to sound precise. 4. You communicate for recognition, not resonance. If you want to sound like an independent authority: 1. Lead with demonstrable improvement, not historical affiliation. 2. Teach the logic that drives your decisions, not the résumé that justifies them. 3. Redefine enterprise methodology for the scale of your current clients. 4. Replace prestige with precision and prediction. Saying “My time at Deloitte taught me to manage billion-dollar integrations” is a biographical statement. Saying “That same framework enabled a $25M firm to compress operating cycles by 18% last quarter” It is a commercial argument. One signals memory. The other signals mastery. Your former title might have implied competence once, But sustainable authority depends on interpretation, synthesis, and repeated demonstration of impact. The market does not reward nostalgia.