Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Lévis

BonBonneyfier : un espace vivant où créativité, IA souveraine, évolution humaine et co-création se rencontrent pour bâtir demain.

10 contributions to YES YOU CAN!
Challenge: Making a rage game in 30 days [04/30]
Hi I am a gamedev and I document my challenge of making a game in 30 days and releasing it on steam. Hopefully I can inspire others to follow their dreams being confident and showing themselves and their work on social media!
Challenge: Making a rage game in 30 days [04/30]
0 likes • 2m
[attachment]
Challenge: Making a rage game in 30 days [03/30]
Hi I am a gamedev and I document my challenge of making a game in 30 days and releasing it on steam. Hopefully I can inspire others to follow their dreams being confident and showing themselves and their work on social media!
Challenge: Making a rage game in 30 days [03/30]
4 likes • 23h
Looking good! keep it going!
Double the fun!! 2 LIVE Events to close out the week!
Happy Friday beautiful souls, @Andrew Brooks and I will be Live again for Day 2: Health is Wealth 11:00 AM PT/1:00 PM CT!!! AND @Jarne Großstück and I invite you to join us for The Consciousness Evolution community call. Today we are discussing The Shift and the Liminal space between all that was and all that is unfolding!! Join us at 12:30 PM PT/2:30 PMCT/7:30 PM CEST Loved having you all with us over the last few calls, @Gary Lang, @Val Vosburg, @Phoenix Wilder, @Emma Fábryová, @Ope Dreville, @Mahmoud Bayoumi, @Thorben Hauerstein, @Jeremy Miller, @Terence James, @Lévis Côté Tremblay and would love to see you there!! All are welcome!!! ✨💃🌹❤️‍🔥💥 Yes You Can, Dana✨🤍🌹🖤✨
Double the fun!! 2 LIVE Events to close out the week!
3 likes • 2d
@Dana Renee I was away sorry
the next time you have a doubt...
the first thing that comes to my mind is that you can doubt the doubt... but then I just listened to this video and thout that it totally says YES YOU CAN
3 likes • 5d
@Gary Lang
3 likes • 5d
@Dana Renee Darryl Anka is best known as an American filmmaker, special effects artist, and channeler who has claimed to telepathically channel an extraterrestrial entity named Bashar. 1. Early Life & Career Born in Ottawa, Canada, and raised in Southern California, Darryl Anka was raised Catholic and initially had no strong leanings toward esoteric or spiritual subjects. He possessed a creative background from an early age, working as an artist, designer, and writer. This creative interest eventually led him to work in Hollywood as a special effects artist, miniature maker, and set designer, contributing to major feature films, TV shows, and entertainment projects. 2. The 1973 UFO Encounters Anka’s turning point occurred in 1973 around age 23, when he experienced two separate, broad-daylight UFO sightings in Los Angeles within a week of each other: - The Sightings: Both involved a dark, metallic, triangular craft hovering close to the ground (at distances of approximately 150 feet and 70 feet). - Witnesses: He was accompanied by friends and family members who also witnessed the objects. - Impact: The close-range sightings shattered his view of reality and ignited a decadelong search into metaphysics, consciousness, and the nature of reality. 3. The Beginning of Channeling (1983–1984) Ten years after his UFO sightings, Anka attended a class on channeling to research consciousness for a creative writing project: - During a guided meditation, he experienced a strong telepathic connection. He described receiving an instant "download" of memories revealing that the 1973 UFO sighting had been an intentional cue to trigger a pre-incarnational agreement to serve as a conduit for an entity. - Contemporaneous validation came when a fellow student in the room began sketching an image that matched the mental picture Anka was receiving. - Shortly after, in 1983–1984, Anka began publicly channeling the entity known as Bashar.
Vedic Wisdom Bites 🐒: Understanding the Absolute: Beyond the Limits of the Mind
In order to discuss the Absolute, you need a pure intellect. No amount of darkness will give you light. If you can’t recognise gold, you need to inform yourself about it from an expert.
If you do not, you will get cheated. Same thing to understand the absolute. You cannot speculate who He is, what His form, qualities and pastimes are. “‘The sages who have realized the Absolute Truth are steeped in the samādhi of deep meditation. In that state, they deliberate upon the transcendental qualities of the Supreme Lord. With their own pure intellect they directly perceive the mystical and absolute spiritual potencies of the Lord that are non-different from the Lord Himself. These potencies arrange and initiate the entire spectrum of universal causes and effects, the control of the jīva souls, the natural phenomena, time, and activities.’ This gives us an important principle: spiritual truth is not created by our speculation; it is revealed to purified consciousness. The more the intellect becomes free from selfish desire, conditioning, and false identification, the more capable it becomes of receiving and recognizing spiritual reality. This is why the Vedic tradition places such importance on scripture, realized teachers, and spiritual practice. We do not have to understand everything immediately. We begin by listening, questioning sincerely, practicing, and gradually purifying our consciousness. The Absolute is unlimited, while we are limited. Therefore, humility is not weakness—it is intelligence. We recognise the limits of our present understanding while remaining open to a reality greater than what our mind can presently conceive. We cannot manufacture the Truth. We can prepare ourselves to perceive it. And when the intellect becomes purified, what once seemed impossible or contradictory can gradually reveal itself as a deeper harmony within the Supreme.

“ What is one belief or assumption I hold about the Supreme that I have never really questioned or explored—and what could I do today to understand it more deeply?”
3 likes • 7d
@Dana Renee My experience of the Divine is deeply connected to language, but not limited to it. Language has a profound function in the brain. The words we repeatedly attach to an experience can become part of how we remember it, interpret it, and experience it again. In that sense, believing the language we use can become part of our reality — although that reality is still a representation, not necessarily the thing itself. This is where I find the question of the Absolute fascinating. I have encountered thousands of ideas, traditions, philosophies and systems that can appear radically different, sometimes even contradictory. Yet beneath the surface, I keep noticing recurring functions and patterns in the way their languages organize experience: memory, identity, relationship, transformation, suffering, meaning, connection and liberation. I don't learn particularly well by simply adopting someone else's framework. My understanding tends to emerge through a combination of experience, pattern recognition, intuition and questioning. Some of the things I have experienced have been difficult to explain through conventional language. So I try to hold both sides: I respect the depth that language can reveal, while remembering that the map is still a map. For me, humility is not abandoning intuition or inquiry. It is being willing to ask whether the language I use to describe an experience is revealing something — or quietly becoming the boundary of what I am able to perceive. NOVA itself came from that place for me: an internal fire that I have been trying to externalize through code, making something implicit progressively explicit. Thousands of seemingly different patterns have passed through that process, and I keep finding structural similarities underneath their different languages. I don't know whether that leads to the Absolute. But it keeps leading me deeper into the question.
1 like • 7d
@Dhira Lalita Yes, I see what you mean now, and this is exactly where the question of language becomes fascinating for me. I agree that the word and the thing it represents are not necessarily the same. But I also think language has a power that goes far beyond simple representation. A word can change a person's state depending on intention, context, relationship and reception. The same word can wound one person, comfort another, or become an intimate expression of affection between two people. That is why I am cautious with the word “absolute” itself. When we call something Absolute, we have already placed a boundary around it through language. The word may point toward something beyond our conceptual limits, but our understanding of the word remains conditioned by our own language, culture, memory and experience. So I find the Vedic idea fascinating rather than something I would simply accept or reject. Perhaps the deeper question is whether certain forms of language merely describe reality, or whether they can participate in changing the consciousness that receives them. And I think this is where your point about Sanskrit becomes particularly interesting. I would love to experience the Sanskrit verse and then the English translation — not simply to compare the dictionary meanings, but to observe what changes between the two: sound, rhythm, association, emotional reception and perhaps even the way the mind organizes the meaning. For me, that is part of what I mean by a “language of the Divine.” I don't want to reduce the mystery to a definition. I want to understand what happens when language becomes a living practice.
1-10 of 10
Lévis Côté Tremblay
3
13 points to level up
@bonbonne556
Bonjour, mes intérêts sont les IA, le Quantique et la Métaphysique.

Online now
Joined Aug 24, 2026
INFJ
Sherbrooke
Powered by