Hormozi breaks Leaderboard system?
Feel like there's an opportunity to learn and improve Skool's Leaderboard / Metrics system. Hormozi posting last week is a good example of what' should and shouldn't be evaluated. There's people in here everyday like @Ted Carr who contribute a wealth of knowledge to a community. Alex Hormozi came in 5 days ago with a simple "New to Skool. Who dis?" and he's now ranking #1 bumping Ted down. I know the metric being evaluated is purely likes but... when surfacing a leaderboard and real contributors to a community shouldn't we evaluate deeper metrics across the board? To identify real contributing members? I.e. - Days logged in - Daily Activity - Comment Replies - % of Classroom completed - DM's replied to This isn't a negative towards Hormozi, he's just introducing himself and it's valuable to some. But I would wager from a communities perspective and a community owners perspective, Ted should be #1 and Hormozi should be bumped to 3rd based off core Skool data points.