Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Mark

AI Community

3.3k members • Free

Join 3,300+ accountants & bookkeepers learning AI together — ChatGPT, Claude, Excel and more - free. And the $7 privacy course keeps client data safe.

AI Academy

672 members • $97/m

Save 10+ hours a week in your accounting firm with AI — even if you have never written prompts. The AI playbook for CPAs, accountants and bookkeepers.

The AI Advantage

128k members • Free

Vibe Coding GOAT 🐐

1.4k members • $36/month

The Virtual Bookkeeping Series

86.8k members • Free

Number Coaching Academy

16 members • $39/m

Almost Evergreen

758 members • $444

AI Pioneers

8.4k members • Free

ChatGPT Mastery

735 members • Free

Value Pricing for Accountants

1k members • $7/month

AI Foundations

542 members • $67/month

241 contributions to AI Community
AI Isn't Always Right. Humans Aren't Either
I caught ChatGPT trying to improve a sentence that I'd written. It suggested replacing "That is what I'm still thinking about" with "That's what I'm still thinking about." There was just one problem: I'd written "That's." So I called ChatGPT on it: "Hold on. That's not what I wrote. Where did you get that?" We talked it through and realized what had happened. It wasn't looking at my sentence. It was mentally carrying over an earlier version of the conversation. It wasn't a big deal. I didn't think that AI was broken. I was really just curious how ChatGPT came up with the word that didn't exist. It struck me how differently a lot of people treat AI compared to humans. If a coworker made the same mistake, we wouldn't declare them unreliable and not fit to work with forever. We'd just ask them to hold on a minute so we could figure out where the mistake happened. People work through a misunderstanding and move on. What's funny is that the same conversation that contained the mistake also had some of the best insights. Correcting one mistake doesn't mean losing confidence in either AI or a person. I'm not right all the time, and I'm comfortable with that. Maybe AI deserves the same space to be wrong sometimes. It gives us room to question, think, and collaborate.
1 like • 1d
That's such a great insight! I'm finding that over the last week or so, there are many times when Claude is plain wrong. When I push back and think things through more, I realise it's wrong, but as you say, AI does some amazing things too. I now accept that it makes mistakes, so I question most responses I get back. That's the human judgement piece, which AI can't replicate. We should never blindly accept the things it says. We should always be curious, ensure we understand the reasons why, and recognise that sometimes it's wrong. If we suspect that's the case, push back.
🎥 The interview everyone's been asking about is now on YouTube
A few months ago, someone who isn't an accountant built the world's first AI accountancy firm. Eleven AI "colleagues". Each with a name, a job title, and a workstream. And a managing partner called Grace Ledger. I sat down with Alexis Kingsbury ... the man behind it, and author of the number one Amazon bestseller Accrual Intentions ... to find out what actually happened. It's not a story about AI replacing accountants. It's far more useful than that. In the conversation we get into: - What "agentic AI" really means, and why it changed everything in 2026 - How his AI team built 108 files in 8 minutes ... and where that went badly wrong - The moment the AI confidently pushed him to take paying clients with no AML registration - Why you should never let AI do your calculations, and what to do instead - Why confident, beautifully presented AI errors are harder to spot than a junior's - What this all means for junior roles and the future of the profession My honest take ... this was one of the most eye-opening chats I've had all year. Alexis is refreshingly straight about where AI is brilliant and where it's genuinely dangerous. 👉 The recording is here (Please help support the YouTube channel by Liking the video and subscribing). Have a watch, then tell me in the comments ... would you ever let AI loose on your own year-end accounts? 👇
2 likes • 6d
@Linda Rolf what I'm finding really interesting right now is the new Grok Bot, which I think is an indication of what's to come. You can create agents with personalities and their own workspace so that they can all work with each other.
0 likes • 4d
@Linda Rolf I think there should always be a human in the loop, but I know some people, including Alexis, have an agent whose job is to manage the other agents and review their work. I've seen other people doing that when it comes to coding.
📌 Start Here! (Welcome & Introduction) 🚀
Welcome to the AI Community! I'm thrilled you're here. 👋 Watch the quick START HERE to get oriented and see exactly how to make the most out of your membership. You can find it here. Then, let's get connected—introduce yourself below! Share where you are from, what you're excited to learn about AI, and your biggest goal for joining this community. This is your place to explore, engage, and elevate your accounting practice through cutting-edge AI. I'm here to support your journey every step of the way. Let’s get started! 🎉
0 likes • 7d
@Rachel Hickombottom Love your attitude and good luck with the launch.
0 likes • 5d
@Daniel Williamson welcome to the community, Daniel. It's great to have you here. Let me know whenever you have questions.
Claude Creates a Hidden Watermark in Its Work
Anthropic announced that it's embedding a watermark in all of the text it creates. This is cleverly woven into the text so it's not visible to a human. If you've been using Claude to write and distribute text for you, be aware that it now includes a permanent footprint. If you're copying and pasting even some of what Claude has written, you might want to consider typing it yourself instead. It seems likely that platforms that are pushing back on AI-generated content now have a clearer way to detect it. https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16266773-how-claude-marks-ai-generated-content
2 likes • 9d
Interesting development, and I'm not really sure what to think of it. There's a part of me that thinks it's completely pointless because I think we'll get to a stage soon where everything is AI-generated. As it says in the article, even if you write your own content but use AI to proofread it, it will get the watermark. If everything is AI-generated, what's the point of the watermark? It's probably a case of the EU lawmakers with too much time on their hands.
0 likes • 7d
@Linda Rolf That's a really interesting point about the legal aspect.
🎯 Free live session: The AI-Powered Accountant — Wednesday 12 August
I’m running a free, live session showing exactly how accountants are putting AI to work — and I’d love you there. I’ll show you, step by step: prompts that work first time, a client dashboard built live, a simple app (no code), and how to turn a set of numbers into advisory insight — safely. It’s free, live, and about 3 hours. Register to save your seat and get the Pre-Session Workbook: 👉 Register here
🎯 Free live session: The AI-Powered Accountant — Wednesday 12 August
3 likes • 15d
@Michelle Cohn I look forward to seeing you live via the chat box.
0 likes • 8d
@Krista McLellan Yes, the recording will be available very soon.
1-10 of 241
Mark Wickersham
6
60 points to level up
@mark-wickersham-1857
Public speaker, author and entrepreneur teaching owners of accounting firms how to build more successful businesses.

Active 8h ago
Joined Mar 19, 2025
Powered by