@Edgar Higham - following up from our conversation last night, I took a stab at putting together a Claude skill that turns YOUR real training philosophy into a Claude skill you hand to your athletes. They talk to it, it answers the way you'd answer. Two ways to build it: 1)it pulls your actual words from your content (grabs the real transcripts off your YouTube, plus your newsletter, blog, etc), or 2) it walks you through a questionnaire, or both. I tried to emphasize the parts where a coaches input would be invaluable: Athlete says "sharp knee pain but my race is in 3 weeks, push through?" - it stops and tells them to text you. Injury, anything medical, changing the goal race - all routes back to the coach. It scales your voice, it doesn't practice medicine in your name nor does it alter plans without your approval. This skill itself is actually meant to output a unique skill to each coach. So give it a shot and let me know your thoughts. Full guide and setup here: https://www.skool.com/athlete-ai-community/classroom/c89bd042?md=5ad531528c08497f9523fc19d97ba71d Anyone other coaches, take a shot at creating your own coach skill with this and let the squad know how it works! Have a great weekend team! Some big stuff coming this weekend and early next week!

I am utilizing the setup a bit differently. I have a human coach. The goal is not for the AI to replace my coach. While I would still like the setup to build a plan, the main intent is for the AI to enhance what my coach is giving me, analyze my performance, and cross-check her prescriptions. I'd like the AI to verify the volume, intensity, and progression, as well as provide recommendations for optimizing my training and performance. With that, should I still create the plan as outlined on Day 2? If not, what modifications should I make or what other skills should I consider?